Loading...
Canada deserves to know.
Loading...
Tag
2 articles
Mark Carney joined Brookfield Asset Management in 2020 as Vice Chair and Head of ESG and Impact Investing, later becoming Chair of the Brookfield Asset Management board. He held those roles until January 2025, immediately before launching his successful Liberal leadership campaign and becoming Prime Minister in March 2025. According to Brookfield's 10-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Carney held 409,300 unexercised Brookfield stock options worth approximately US$6.8 million as of December 31, 2024. Brookfield is one of the largest residential property owners in Canada, with 31,211 residential units in the country (part of a North American portfolio of over 73,000 single-family lots). Upon becoming Prime Minister, Carney placed his assets in a blind trust and established a conflict-of-interest screen — administered by his chief of staff Marc-André Blanchard and Privy Council Clerk Michael Sabia — intended to wall him off from official decisions involving Brookfield and the payment-processing firm Stripe (on whose board he also served). His ethics filing lists more than 100 entities under the conflict-of-interest screen. In April 2026, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics published a report recommending that prime ministers be required to fully divest their investment portfolios on taking office, not merely place them in a blind trust. Democracy Watch has characterized the blind-trust-and-screen arrangement as "loophole-filled." This article documents the financial relationship, the conflict-of-interest architecture, the specific concerns raised about it, and Carney's defenses — sticking strictly to the documented financial record.
On a state visit to India that concluded on March 2, 2026, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a series of measures to deepen the Canada-India bilateral education relationship. The most-publicized commitment was a University of Toronto pledge of up to $100 million to fund up to 200 fully-funded scholarships for Indian students — covering tuition, living expenses, and associated costs. The funding is from the University of Toronto's institutional resources, not from the federal Government of Canada's consolidated revenue fund — an important factual qualifier this article puts up front. The announcement was made during a Prime-Minister-led diplomatic mission and was a centrepiece communication of that visit. In the same six-month window, the Parliamentary Budget Officer published a formal estimate that the federal Government of Canada is underfunding the operating and maintenance costs of First Nations water-treatment infrastructure by approximately $138 million per year. As of early 2026, 40 long-term drinking-water advisories remain in place on First Nations reserves — 9 of those have been in place for more than a decade. The Auditor General has characterized Indigenous Services Canada's progress on drinking-water as "unsatisfactory." This article documents both numbers, the political moment that brought them into juxtaposition, the honest distinction between institutional and federal funding sources, and what an apples-to-apples Indigenous-spending comparison would look like.