Loading...
Canada deserves to know.
Loading...
Tag
6 articles
On March 12, 2026, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) issued Telecom Regulatory Policy 2026-43, amending the Wireless Code and the Internet Code to prohibit fees that discourage Canadians from switching plans or providers. The rules took full effect on June 12, 2026. They ban activation fees, plan-change (modification) fees, and early-cancellation fees where no subsidized device is being financed — charges that ranged from roughly $30 to $80 at the major carriers. The CRTC estimates the change will save Canadians more than $600 million per year by removing barriers to switching. A companion ruling on April 24, 2026 expanded self-service requirements: customers must be able to change or cancel cell phone and internet plans through an app, online, or by email, and providers must send written confirmation of any self-service action. The rules apply to Rogers, Bell, Telus and their flanker brands (Fido, Virgin Plus, Koodo and others) as well as regional and smaller carriers. Two things are not eliminated: outstanding device-financing balances on a subsidized phone, and reasonable physical-installation fees (relevant mainly to home internet). The ban is a concrete consumer win. The accountability point is what it implies: switching fees are friction that only persists in a market where customers have few places to go. This article documents the change, who it covers, and why — as Parliament Audit's coverage of the Big Three oligopoly and the streaming levy has detailed — removing the lock-in fees does not address the underlying concentration that keeps Canadian telecom prices high.
Canada produced about 6.1 million barrels of oil per day in 2025. Its 14 refineries can process about 1.9 million barrels per day and ran at roughly 90% of that capacity. The arithmetic gap defines the system: roughly 4 million barrels a day leave the country as crude, 98% of it to the United States (2024), where Gulf Coast and Midwest refineries — built specifically to process heavy oil — capture the refining margin. During the 2025-26 trade war, the United States imposed a 10% tariff on Canadian crude, taxing the very flow Canada depends on. Meanwhile Canada re-imports refined products, and Ontario and Quebec refineries now source their imported crude almost entirely (99%+) from the United States. The most vivid loop is British Columbia's: Alberta crude moves via Trans Mountain to Washington State refineries (BP Cherry Point runs substantially on Alaskan and Canadian crude), and the largest share of Washington's exported refined product ships right back to B.C. — a figure documented at roughly 145,000 barrels per day of crude south and gasoline/jet fuel north in the mid-2010s. No major Canadian refinery has been built since 1984; the one attempt, Alberta's Sturgeon Refinery (2017-2020), ballooned from $5.7 billion to roughly $10 billion for just ~80,000 barrels per day, with Alberta taxpayers absorbing a 50% stake plus $25 billion in 30-year processing commitments. Economists like Trevor Tombe argue the market is signalling Canada has no comparative advantage in marginal refining; sovereignty advocates answer that the trade war has repriced the risk of refining dependence on a single foreign customer. The carbon argument the operator class often makes — that the round trip burns extra emissions — is real but modest: transport is a small share of oil's lifecycle emissions compared to extraction and combustion. The harder documented cost is economic: the value-added margin, and the Western Canadian Select discount, surrendered every day at the border. Both major federal leaders now propose versions of an answer — Carney's "energy superpower" agenda and Alberta pipeline memorandum aimed at Asian markets, Poilievre's Canada First National Energy Corridor — and both, notably, are about moving more crude, not refining it.
Canadians commonly call it the cell phone monopoly. Technically it is an oligopoly: Bell, Rogers, and Telus, together with the flanker brands they own — Fido, Chatr and Cityfone (Rogers), Koodo and Public Mobile (Telus), Virgin Plus and Lucky Mobile (Bell) — control roughly 90% of the Canadian wireless market. This article traces how that happened: the Telecommunications Act's foreign-ownership rules (the "80/80 rule" plus the 10% market-share rule) that keep foreign carriers from competing at scale; the 2008 AWS spectrum auction in which Ottawa set aside spectrum to create new competitors (Wind Mobile, Mobilicity, Public Mobile); and the decade in which every one of those entrants was absorbed — Public Mobile by Telus (2013), Mobilicity by Rogers (2015), Wind by Shaw (2016, renamed Freedom Mobile), Manitoba's MTS by Bell (2017), and finally Shaw itself by Rogers in a $26-billion merger completed in 2023. The article catalogues who has actually fought back: the Harper Conservatives' 2013 attempt to recruit Verizon (defeated by the Big Three's "Fair for Canada" lobbying campaign and Verizon's withdrawal); the NDP's price-cap pledges under Jagmeet Singh; the Competition Bureau's full-scale legal war against the Rogers-Shaw merger (lost at the Competition Tribunal in December 2022 and at the Federal Court of Appeal in January 2023); Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne's extracted conditions (Vidéotron must hold Freedom Mobile for 10 years and price Ontario/Western plans comparably to its Quebec plans, roughly 20% below incumbent levels); and the CRTC's consumer-protection turn, including the fee bans taking effect June 12, 2026 that the regulator estimates will save Canadians more than $600 million per year. The honest scoreboard: CRTC-measured wireless prices fell roughly 25% over two years after the Vidéotron remedy — and in October and November 2025, Statistics Canada recorded the first year-over-year cellular price increases in about 30 months, suggesting the competitive window opened by the merger remedies may already be narrowing.
Tax Freedom Day is the Fraser Institute's annual calculation of the day the average Canadian family has earned enough money to pay the taxes it owes to federal, provincial, and local governments combined. In 2026, that day is June 9. By the Fraser methodology, the average Canadian family (two or more individuals) will earn $166,790 in cash income this year and pay $72,539 in total taxes — 43.5% of its income. Tax Freedom Day arrives one day later than 2025 (June 8) because total taxes are growing faster (+3.0%, +$2,098) than cash income (+2.2%, +$3,575). The single largest year-over-year increase was income taxes (+$1,057 per family), followed by payroll & health taxes (+$569), sales taxes (+$446), property taxes (+$189), and "other taxes" (+$283). Profit taxes, import duties, alcohol/tobacco/amusement taxes, and natural-resource levies all declined slightly. Two provinces raised personal income tax rates for 2026: British Columbia raised its lowest bracket from 5.06% to 5.60%, and Prince Edward Island introduced a new top bracket for income over $200,000 at 20.0%. The earliest provincial Tax Freedom Day falls on May 20 in Saskatchewan; the latest is June 27 in Quebec, with Ontario at June 8. The full category-by-category breakdown of the $72,539 tax bill — every line from the Fraser Table 2 Canada column, summing exactly to $72,539 — is in the chart attached to this article.
On May 21, 2026, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) finalized a decision tripling the mandatory contribution rate that foreign streaming services with $25 million or more in Canadian revenue must pay to Canadian-content production funds — from a 5% interim rate (set in 2024 and under court challenge) to 15%. Industry analysts estimate the pass-through cost to consumers at $1.50 to $4.00 per service per month — roughly $18 to $48 per service per year. A typical Canadian household subscribed to Netflix Premium, Disney+, Crave, and Amazon Prime Video would see an annual increase on the order of $78. The federal government has publicly acknowledged the cost is likely to fall on Canadians and has directed the CRTC to revisit the decision. The Canadian wireless industry is the most-cited domestic precedent for what happens when foreign competition is structurally excluded from a Canadian market. The Telecommunications Act and Radiocommunication Act impose ownership restrictions (the "80/80 rule": at least 80% of voting shares and at least 80% of board members must be Canadian) that, combined with a 10% market-share trigger, effectively prevent large U.S. carriers from acquiring or fully entering Canada's wireless market. The result is documented across multiple independent studies: Canada's "Big Three" carriers (Bell, Rogers, Telus) charge prices that international comparisons regularly place among the highest in the developed world. This article walks the streaming-cost analysis, the statutory wireless-protection architecture, the Verizon 2013 attempt that was effectively dissuaded by the policy environment, expert commentary from former Competition Bureau leadership, the federal government's own admission on streaming-cost passthrough, and the honest qualifiers — including that Canadian wireless prices have come down materially since 2018 and that the streaming and wireless cases are not perfectly identical.
Across Prime Minister Mark Carney's first year in office (March 2025 - February 2026), in-flight catering on the 28 official flights he took as Prime Minister cost approximately $524,815 CAD (£281,773 in the original UK media reporting). The figure was provided in writing by the Government of Canada in response to Order Paper Questions tabled by opposition Members of Parliament — meaning the number is the government's own published answer, drawn from internal expense records. Specific high-cost examples documented in the response: approximately $21,000 in catering for a two-hour flight to Washington DC in May 2025 for the Prime Minister's first meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump; approximately $159,000 in catering for a combined visit to the United Arab Emirates and the G20 summit in Johannesburg; and an October 2025 flight where the refreshments cost approximately eleven times the fuel costs for that journey for 55 delegates. For comparison: Statistics Canada's Survey of Household Spending reports the average Canadian household spent $8,659 on food from stores in 2023; Canada's Food Price Report 2024 projected a typical family of four would spend $16,297.20 annually on a healthy diet, or $339 per person per month. The Carney flight-catering total therefore equals roughly 60 family-of-four annual healthy-diet budgets, or 32 average household annual grocery bills. This article documents the proactive-disclosure record, the specific high-cost flights, the family-food comparison, and the honest caveats — including the fact that "refreshments" covers the entire travelling delegation, not just the Prime Minister personally.