Loading...
Canada deserves to know.
Loading...
Tag
2 articles
House of Commons standing committees — roughly two dozen permanent bodies of about a dozen MPs each, with membership proportional to party standings in the House — are where the substantive work of Parliament happens. After a bill passes second reading (approval in principle), it goes to the relevant committee for clause-by-clause study: witnesses testify, members propose amendments, and the committee reports the bill back to the House with or without changes. Committee power over a bill has a hard procedural boundary: amendments must respect the principle and scope of the bill the House approved at second reading, and committees cannot rewrite a bill into something else. Beyond legislation, committees scrutinize departmental spending plans (the estimates), conduct studies, and can compel documents and testimony — powers at the centre of repeated showdowns with governments, including the document fight that produced the 2011 contempt-of-Parliament finding. Control matters: most committees are chaired by government MPs, but the Standing Orders deliberately assign three accountability committees — Public Accounts; Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics; and Government Operations and Estimates — to opposition chairs. In a minority Parliament, opposition parties combined hold committee majorities, which is why minority-era committees produce investigations majorities would never allow.
On April 28, 2026 — the first day the Liberals’ new House majority took effect — two House of Commons standing committees voted to go in camera on motions involving public-interest accountability. At HESA (Health), Liberal Parliamentary Secretary Maggie Chi moved to take the meeting in camera while a Conservative motion to ask the Auditor General to audit PrescribeIT was on the floor. The vote was 6–5: six Liberals YEA, four Conservatives plus one Bloc MP NAY. At ETHI (Ethics), Liberal members made an identical move on a Conservative motion that would have required the Privy Council Office to provide regular updates on the Prime Minister’s ethics screen. The pattern triggered a public defence from Liberal House leader Steven MacKinnon, who pledged "open committees" the next day.