Loading...
Canada deserves to know.
Loading...
Tag
1 article
Canadians commonly call it the cell phone monopoly. Technically it is an oligopoly: Bell, Rogers, and Telus, together with the flanker brands they own — Fido, Chatr and Cityfone (Rogers), Koodo and Public Mobile (Telus), Virgin Plus and Lucky Mobile (Bell) — control roughly 90% of the Canadian wireless market. This article traces how that happened: the Telecommunications Act's foreign-ownership rules (the "80/80 rule" plus the 10% market-share rule) that keep foreign carriers from competing at scale; the 2008 AWS spectrum auction in which Ottawa set aside spectrum to create new competitors (Wind Mobile, Mobilicity, Public Mobile); and the decade in which every one of those entrants was absorbed — Public Mobile by Telus (2013), Mobilicity by Rogers (2015), Wind by Shaw (2016, renamed Freedom Mobile), Manitoba's MTS by Bell (2017), and finally Shaw itself by Rogers in a $26-billion merger completed in 2023. The article catalogues who has actually fought back: the Harper Conservatives' 2013 attempt to recruit Verizon (defeated by the Big Three's "Fair for Canada" lobbying campaign and Verizon's withdrawal); the NDP's price-cap pledges under Jagmeet Singh; the Competition Bureau's full-scale legal war against the Rogers-Shaw merger (lost at the Competition Tribunal in December 2022 and at the Federal Court of Appeal in January 2023); Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne's extracted conditions (Vidéotron must hold Freedom Mobile for 10 years and price Ontario/Western plans comparably to its Quebec plans, roughly 20% below incumbent levels); and the CRTC's consumer-protection turn, including the fee bans taking effect June 12, 2026 that the regulator estimates will save Canadians more than $600 million per year. The honest scoreboard: CRTC-measured wireless prices fell roughly 25% over two years after the Vidéotron remedy — and in October and November 2025, Statistics Canada recorded the first year-over-year cellular price increases in about 30 months, suggesting the competitive window opened by the merger remedies may already be narrowing.